Your article has quite a few awesome points. I really like the Kantian perspective and the Ouroboros one. They make sense and offer interesting views on the problem.
I think AI is a wonderful invention of this century, but it has come with a big cost, and the reason is still human. I think most people who criticize AI are viewin…
Your article has quite a few awesome points. I really like the Kantian perspective and the Ouroboros one. They make sense and offer interesting views on the problem.
I think AI is a wonderful invention of this century, but it has come with a big cost, and the reason is still human. I think most people who criticize AI are viewing it as an independent entity, but who we should aim our gun at is the companies who build AI in a inevitable detrimental way.
This article might speak into the air about the scary future. It's inevitable for this future problem and many countless other problems on Earth (e.g., climate change, poverty, etc.) to gradually be normalized, since that's what most humans do. We're inclined **towards** short-term benefits, as much as everybody is.
Fighting over AI companies is a repeated history of the climate pollution problem and so many other problems. It's difficult due to human nature, society factors, etc. It's heartbreaking for me to see climate change as not as critical as before, even though it's still happening drastically. That day will come for AI, I firmly believe.
If the root problem isn't addressed—humanity—AI and so many problems will continue to add up to the destruction of this society.
The internet is a free space for everyone. That's what it was created for. How great our lives have become thanks to it.
Artists post artwork to the internet and enforce their ownership by temporary measures like watermarks, etc., since they're not tech people and have to rely on self-created methods. Illegally retrieved movies are everywhere (e.g., torrent, phimmoi, etc.). People lacked the means to protect themselves and their work back then, and AI makes it more visible and worse. People even try to exploit the legal system to be able to access free resources, not just AI companies. As we can see, the problem has always been there, and it's not unfamiliar at all. It's not AI companies' responsibility to protect artists while they are posting artwork without any protection (which is weak or not efficient).
In a world where fairness is not universally practiced, it is often not the initial choice for individuals or organizations to act contrary to the norm, as this can put them at a disadvantage, especially during the early stages of development. Well-established companies are more likely to have the resources to address long-term sustainability issues (if it is not too late) once their market position is secure.
As individuals, we should seek ways to address this problem through our own initiatives (e.g., developing methods to protect copyright for creative work that individual artists can implement), in addition to protesting or influencing larger entities (drawing from the experiences of other global issues). The advancement of AI is necessary, and I believe it holds the potential for positive societal impact. As experienced human beings, we will hopefully find ways to create harmony rather than discord.
Hi Duy Le,
Your article has quite a few awesome points. I really like the Kantian perspective and the Ouroboros one. They make sense and offer interesting views on the problem.
I think AI is a wonderful invention of this century, but it has come with a big cost, and the reason is still human. I think most people who criticize AI are viewing it as an independent entity, but who we should aim our gun at is the companies who build AI in a inevitable detrimental way.
This article might speak into the air about the scary future. It's inevitable for this future problem and many countless other problems on Earth (e.g., climate change, poverty, etc.) to gradually be normalized, since that's what most humans do. We're inclined **towards** short-term benefits, as much as everybody is.
Fighting over AI companies is a repeated history of the climate pollution problem and so many other problems. It's difficult due to human nature, society factors, etc. It's heartbreaking for me to see climate change as not as critical as before, even though it's still happening drastically. That day will come for AI, I firmly believe.
If the root problem isn't addressed—humanity—AI and so many problems will continue to add up to the destruction of this society.
The internet is a free space for everyone. That's what it was created for. How great our lives have become thanks to it.
Artists post artwork to the internet and enforce their ownership by temporary measures like watermarks, etc., since they're not tech people and have to rely on self-created methods. Illegally retrieved movies are everywhere (e.g., torrent, phimmoi, etc.). People lacked the means to protect themselves and their work back then, and AI makes it more visible and worse. People even try to exploit the legal system to be able to access free resources, not just AI companies. As we can see, the problem has always been there, and it's not unfamiliar at all. It's not AI companies' responsibility to protect artists while they are posting artwork without any protection (which is weak or not efficient).
In a world where fairness is not universally practiced, it is often not the initial choice for individuals or organizations to act contrary to the norm, as this can put them at a disadvantage, especially during the early stages of development. Well-established companies are more likely to have the resources to address long-term sustainability issues (if it is not too late) once their market position is secure.
As individuals, we should seek ways to address this problem through our own initiatives (e.g., developing methods to protect copyright for creative work that individual artists can implement), in addition to protesting or influencing larger entities (drawing from the experiences of other global issues). The advancement of AI is necessary, and I believe it holds the potential for positive societal impact. As experienced human beings, we will hopefully find ways to create harmony rather than discord.
Thank you again for such an awesome post.